As initial intravenous treatment for overt generalized convulsive status epilepticus, lorazepam is more effective than phenytoin. Although lorazepam is no more efficacious than phenobarbital or diazepam plus phenytoin, it is easier to use.

The main limiting factor in patient retention was adverse drug reactions. Patients taking lamotrigine (LTG) or gabapentin (GBP) did better than those taking carbamazepine. Seizure control was similar among groups. LTG and GBP should be considered as initial therapy for older patients with newly diagnosed seizures.

Epilepsy in elderly patients, compared with the younger adult population, differs in etiology, clinical presentation, and prognosis. Challenges in the pharmacologic treatment of epilepsy in the elderly include the following: the physiologic changes associated with aging; adverse events to which the elderly are especially vulnerable; the increased risk for these patients, who are often taking multiple medications; and toxicity from drug-drug interactions. This article presents data on efficacy and safety from clinical trials of newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in elderly patients compared with older AEDs. We discuss the implications of the findings using newer-generation AEDs in the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study (VACS) #428 in order to educate physicians involved in choosing appropriate AEDs for older patients. In the elderly patient population, an optimal treatment outcome of seizure control with minimal or no adverse events is dependent on the well-informed choice of an AED by a physician.

No abstract

Most of the information on predisposing factors and mortality in status epilepticus (SE) arises from data obtained from patients presenting to the casualty department. However, another population which is frequently seen by consultative neurologists are medically ill patients who develop SE while in hospital. These patients are often notoriously difficult to treat once SE arises. We sought to characterize patients at risk for SE arising when they are hospitalized for other reasons. By doing this, risk factors for developing SE and prognostic indicators might be determined. We retrospectively reviewed records from three urban hospitals in the United States to identify hospitalized patients developing SE over a 1 year period. SE was defined as a clinical seizure lasting 30 minutes or longer, or repeated seizures without recovery. Patients who were admitted in SE or for an epilepsy-related problem, or who were less than 1 year old were excluded from the study. Forty-one patients with in-hospital SE were identified. There were 28 males and 13 females with an age range from 1 to 91 years (mean: 60 years, median: 65 years). The mean interval from hospital admission to the onset of status epilepticus was 26 days. Nineteen (46%) patients had a prior history of either epilepsy or symptomatic seizures, and of these, 10 were inadequately treated as judged by serum anticonvulsant levels at the time SE developed. Focal brain abnormality was present in 26 (63%) patients, the most common of which was stroke (17 patients ). Major metabolic derangements including hypoxia, electrolyte imbalance, hepatic encephalopathy, and sepsis were present in 23 (56%) patients. Eleven (27%) patients were being treated with theophylline preparations at the time SE developed. Mortality in this group of patients with in-hospital SE was 61% (25 deaths), with about one-third dying while in status, and two-thirds dying subsequently in hospital. In this retrospective study, there was no clear relationship between mortality and the duration of SE in this group of patients. In-hospital development of SE is usually related to underlying focal brain abnormality, especially stroke, in combination with systemic metabolic derangement. Prognosis is poor, and appears to be more related to underlying conditions rather than to status duration. More accurate prospective studies are warranted.