Micronutrients, vitamins and minerals accessible from the diet, are essential for biologic activity. Micronutrient status varies widely throughout pregnancy and across populations. Women in low-income countries often enter pregnancy malnourished, and the demands of gestation can exacerbate micronutrient deficiencies with health consequences to the fetus. Examples of efficacious single micronutrient interventions include folic acid to prevent neural tube defects, iodine to prevent cretinism, zinc to reduce of preterm birth, and iron to reduce the risk of low birth weight. Folic acid and vitamin D might also increase birth weight. While extensive mechanism and association research links antenatal multiple micronutrients to plausible materno-fetal health advantages, hypothesized benefits have often been absent, minimal or unexpected in trials. These findings suggest a role for population context in determining health responses and extensive gaps in knowledge. Multiple micronutrient supplements reduce risks of being born low birth weight, small for gestational age or stillborn in undernourished settings, and justify micronutrient interventions with antenatal care. Measurable health effects of gestational micronutrient exposure may persist into childhood but few data exists on potential long-term benefits. In this Review, we discuss micronutrient intake recommendations, risks and consequences of deficiencies, and the effects of interventions with a particular emphasis on offspring.

BACKGROUNDCauses of early infant growth restriction remain incompletely understood. Where vitamin D deficiency is common, vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy and lactation may improve fetal-infant growth and other birth outcomes.METHODSWe conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of maternal vitamin D supplementation from 17-24 weeks gestation until birth or 6 months postpartum. Participants were randomly allocated to five vitamin D and/or placebo supplementation groups: (A) 0 IU/week, (B) 4200 IU/week, (C) 16800 IU/week, or (D) 28000 IU/week in pregnancy, all with 0 IU/week postpartum; or, (E) 28000 IU/week in prenatal and postpartum periods. The primary outcome was length-for-age z-score at one year of age according to World Health Organization child growth standards.RESULTSAmong 1164 infants assessed at one year of age (90% of 1300 pregnancies), there were no differences across groups in length-for-age z-scores (mean ±standard deviation): A: -0.93 ±1.05, B: -1.11 ±1.12, C: -0.97 ±0.97, D: -1.06 ±1.07, E: -0.94 ±1.00 (p=0.23). Groups were similar with respect to other anthropometric measures, birth outcomes, and morbidity. Vitamin D had dose- dependent effects on maternal and infant serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and calcium, maternal urinary calcium excretion, and maternal parathyroid hormone concentrations. No clinical adverse events were attributed to the vitamin D intervention. CONCLUSIONSIn a population with widespread prenatal vitamin D deficiency and fetal/infant growth restriction, maternal vitamin D supplementation from mid-pregnancy until birth or 6 months postpartum does not influence fetal or infant growth, and has no beneficial or harmful effects on numerous other birth and infant outcomes.

Maternal vitamin D status is independently associated with markers of physiological and pathological growth in term infants. Adequately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to test whether maternal vitamin D supplementation may improve fetal growth.

Background Studies using vital records-based maternal weight data have become more common, but the validity of these data is uncertain. Methods We evaluated the accuracy of prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) reported on birth certificates using medical record data in 1204 births at a teaching hospital in Pennsylvania from 2003 to 2010. Deliveries at this hospital were representative of births statewide with respect to BMI, GWG, race/ethnicity, and preterm birth. Forty-eight strata were created by simultaneous stratification on prepregnancy BMI (underweight, normal weight/overweight, obese class 1, obese classes 2 and 3), GWG (<20th, 20–80th, >80th percentile), race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black), and gestational age (term, preterm). Results The agreement of birth certificate-derived prepregnancy BMI category with medical record BMI category was highest in the normal weight/overweight and obese class 2 and 3 groups. Agreement varied from 52% to 100% across racial/ethnic and gestational age strata. GWG category from the birth registry agreed with medical records for 41% to 83% of deliveries and agreement tended to be the poorest for very low and very high GWG. The misclassification of GWG was driven by errors in reported prepregnancy weight rather than maternal weight at delivery, and its magnitude depended on prepregnancy BMI category and gestational age at delivery. Conclusions Maternal weight data, particularly at the extremes, are poorly reported on birth certificates. Investigators should devote resources to well-designed validation studies, the results of which can be used to adjust for measurement errors by bias analysis.

No abstract