The human cytomegalovirus major immediate-early protein IE86 is pivotal for coordinated regulation of viral gene expression throughout infection. A relatively promiscuous transactivator of viral early and late gene transcription, IE86 also acts during infection to negatively regulate its own promoter via direct binding to a 14-bp palindromic IE86-binding site, the cis repression sequence (crs), located between the major immediateearly promoter (MIEP) TATA box and the start of transcription. Although such autoregulation does not involve changes in the binding of basal transcription factors to the MIEP in vitro, it does appear to involve selective inhibition of RNA polymerase II recruitment. However, how this occurs is unclear. We show that autorepression by IE86 at late times of infection correlates with changes in chromatin structure around the MIEP during the course of infection and that this is likely to result from physical and functional interactions between IE86 and chromatin remodeling enzymes normally associated with transcriptional repression of cellular promoters. Firstly, we show that IE86-mediated autorepression is inhibited by histone deacetylase inhibitors. We also show that IE86 interacts, in vitro and in vivo, with the histone deacetylase HDAC1 and histone methyltransferases G9a and Suvar(3-9)H1 and that coexpression of these chromatin remodeling enzymes with IE86 increases autorepression of the MIEP. Finally, we show that mutation of the crs in the context of the virus abrogates the transcriptionally repressive chromatin phenotype normally found around the MIEP at late times of infection, suggesting that negative autoregulation by IE86 results, at least in part, from IE86-mediated changes in chromatin structure of the viral MIEP.Efficient productive infection of cells with human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is dependent on a temporal cascade of viral gene expression which relies on the finely tuned, coordinated regulation of specific viral gene products at specific stages of the virus infection cycle. Upon infection of permissive cells, the virus undergoes a regulated cascade of gene expression in three broad phases termed immediate early (IE), early, and late, culminating in the release of infectious virions.The major IE genes are the most abundantly transcribed viral genes at immediate-early times of infection, giving rise to two nuclear phosphoproteins, the 72-kDa (IE72) and 86-kDa (IE86) major IE proteins (59, 62, 69). The expression of IE72 and IE86 is driven by the viral major IE promoter/enhancer (MIEP), and these viral gene products have been implicated in playing a pivotal role in the coordinated regulation of viral gene expression. IE86 acts as a very strong but relatively nonspecific transcriptional activator of viral early and late gene expression; its effect is synergized by the viral IE72 protein.The activation of viral promoters by IE86 is likely to be mediated by direct DNA binding of IE86 to specific DNA-binding sites as well as protein-protein interactions with general transcription f...

EBNA3C can specifically repress the expression of reporter plasmids containing EBV Cp latency-associated promoter elements. Cp is normally the main promoter for EBNA mRNA initiation, so it appears that EBNA3C contributes to a negative autoregulatory control loop. By mutational analysis it was previously established that this repression is consistent with EBNA3C being targeted to Cp by binding the cellular sequence-specific DNA-binding protein CBF1 (also known as recombination signal-binding protein [RBP]-Jκ. Further analysis suggested that in vivo a corepressor interacts with EBNA3C in this DNA binding complex. Results presented here are all consistent with a component of such a corepressor exhibiting histone deacetylase activity. The drug trichostatin A, which specifically inhibits histone deacetylases, relieved two- to threefold the repression of Cp induced by EBNA3C in two different cell types. Moreover, repression of pTK-CAT-Cp4× by EBNA3C was specifically enhanced by cotransfection of an expression plasmid for human histone deacetylase-1 (HDAC1). Consistent with these functional assays, in vitro-translated HDAC1 bound to a glutathioneS-transferase (GST) fusion protein including full-length EBNA3C, and in the reciprocal experiment EBNA3C bound to a GST fusion with the N terminus of HDAC1. Coimmunoprecipitations also revealed an EBNA3C-HDAC1 interaction in vivo, and GST-EBNA3C bound functional histone deacetylase enzyme activity from HeLa cell nuclear extracts. The region of EBNA3C involved in the interaction with HDAC1 appears to correspond to the region which is necessary for binding to CBF1/RBP-Jκ. A direct physical interaction between EBNA3C and HDAC1 was demonstrated with recombinant proteins purified from bacterial cells, and we therefore conclude that HDAC1 and CBF1/RBP-Jκ bind to the same or adjacent regions of EBNA3C. These data suggest that recruitment of histone deacetylase activity makes a significant contribution to the repression of transcription from Cp because EBNA3C bridges an interaction between CBF1/RBP-Jκ and HDAC1.