Ag presentation by dendritic cells (DC) is essential to effective antitumor T cell responses in cancer patients. Depending on their origin, maturation state, and the ambient cytokine milieu, DC can differentiate into distinct subpopulations, which preferentially either induce Th1 cell activation (CD11c+,CD123− myeloid DC (MDC)) or immunosuppressive T cell development (CD11c−,CD123+ plasmacytoid DC (PDC)). The present study was undertaken to characterize the effects of pancreatic carcinoma cell-derived cytokines on immature monocyte-derived DC (iMo-DC) in vitro and in vivo. Medium conditioned by human pancreatic carcinoma cells inhibited iMo-DC proliferation, expression of costimulatory molecules (CD80 and CD40) and of HLA-DR, and functional activity as assessed by MLR and IL-12p70 production. iMo-DC generated from pancreatic carcinoma patients in advanced stages of the disease similarly showed decreased levels of HLA-DR expression and reduced ability to stimulate MLR in response to CD40L and IFN-γ. Moreover, in tumor-patient peripheral blood, the ratio of MDC to PDC cells was lower than in healthy controls due to reduced numbers of MDC CD11c+ cells. Importantly, rather than a single cytokine, a combination of tumor-derived cytokines was responsible for these effects; these were primarily TGF-β, IL-10, and IL-6, but not vascular endothelial growth factor. In summary, we have identified an array of pancreatic carcinoma-derived cytokines that cooperatively affect iMo-DC activation in a manner consistent with ineffective antitumor immune responses.
Flow cytometry (FC) immunophenotyping of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) has been reported to be useful in the diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). The authors reviewed their 5-year experience to assess the ability that FC has in improving the diagnostic capacity of cytomorphology in the diagnosis and subclassification of NHL according to the World Health Organization's classification. FC was performed on 252 FNA specimens. These included 123 cases of NHL (89 primary and 34 recurrent lymphomas). The FC immunophenotyping included CD3, CD4, CD8, CD10, CD19, CD20, CD45, and kappa/lambda antibodies combinations in the screening panel and additional panels for B or T lineage in the presence of positivity for lymphoma after the screening. An immunologic diagnosis was obtained by FC in 90% (111/123) of cases identified as NHL. FC was able to improve the total number of NHL detected in 8 cases where cytomorphology had failed to do so. In 7% (9/123) of cases, FC failed to formulate a diagnostic hypothesis owing to the sample inadequacy; 2 cases (2%) were not identified as lymphomas by FC (1 of them considered only "suggestive" also by cytomorphology); 1 case was not identified neither by FC, nor by cytomorphology. In cases having a histologic follow-up, levels of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the combination cytomorphology/FC were 97% and 94%, respectively. FC applied to FNA enhanced the diagnostic potential of cytologic diagnosis and subclassification of NHL, thus avoiding the need for invasive surgical biopsies in many cases.
IntroductionCNS dissemination in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is a relatively rare but often fatal complication that occurs in the different subtypes of NHL with a frequency of 5% (ie, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL]) to 30% 1 (ie, Burkitt lymphoma [BL] and B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma [B-LL]). Many CNS events occur early after diagnosis (4.7-9 months), during therapy, or shortly after completion of treatment, suggesting that initial CNS involvement could have been undetected in most cases. Prophylactic treatment likely reduces the incidence of CNS relapse, but may increase the toxicity of systemic chemotherapy; furthermore, the incidence of CNS dissemination is not high enough to suggest the use of prophylaxis treatment in all patients affected by aggressive NHL. Therefore, CNS prophylaxis is usually incorporated into protocols for the treatment of B-LL and BL, but it is not systematically warranted in patients with DLBCL. Therefore, the identification of patient subgroups for which CNS prophylaxis may be useful is important, especially for DLBCL patients who have no well-defined risk factors for CNS relapse. Risk models for DLBCL have been developed, but are mainly derived from analyses of retrospective studies. [2][3][4][5] An increased risk of CNS dissemination is associated with involvement of the BM and certain extranodal sites such as testis, paranasal sinuses, orbits, and paravertebral masses. Moreover, patients with a high to intermediate or high risk according to the International Prognostic Index (IPI), particularly those with high serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and involvement of more than 1 extranodal organ, are much more prone to develop CNS involvement than others and should receive CNS prophylaxis. 6 Nevertheless, CNS risk predictors and related prognostic scores have been identified in retrospective and heterogeneous series, including different lymphoma categories; however, resulting scores show a low sensitivity in predicting CNS involvement.The diagnosis of CNS dissemination is frequently suspected by the presence of related signs or symptoms and confirmed by examination of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and neuroimaging techniques. The diagnostic standard conventional cytology (CC) examination of CSF is considered as having low sensitivity and low specificity, with reported falsenegative rates of 20%-60%. 7 This has been ascribed to the paucity of neoplastic cells in the CSF of patients with minimal disease and to the presence of confounding reactive lymphocytes. Therefore, patients with low tumor burden in the CSF, who are more likely to benefit from CNS treatment, are actually more commonly exposed to false-negative [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] However, it is still unknown whether detecting occult leptomeningeal involvement and consequently changing treatment may improve outcome in these patients.In the present study, we compared prospectively FCM analysis versus CC examination of baseline samples of CSF to detect occult leptomeningeal disease in patie...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.