The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score is considered an objective and reliable measure of liver disease severity. However, the use of specific laboratory methodologies may introduce significant and clinically relevant variations into the score. It has been suggested that the incorporation of sodium into MELD (MELD-Na) can provide a more accurate survival prediction than MELD alone. Before implementing organ allocation based on the MELD score in an area with 3 transplant centers, we studied whether there were significant variations in MELD and MELD-Na scores determined at each center. Seventy patients on the waiting list were studied simultaneously. Blood samples for each patient were divided into 3 aliquots and were processed in the 3 laboratories in order to calculate MELD and MELD-Na scores. There were statistical differences between the 3 laboratories in the MELD and MELD-Na scores and their parameters. The MELD score was identical in the 3 laboratories for only 6 of the 70 patients, and the MELD-Na score was identical for only 9. MELD and MELD-Na scores from 2 laboratories differed by 1 point or more in 54% and 47% of cases, respectively. Our study confirms that there is major variability in the MELD score, serum sodium, and MELD-Na score. These differences are clinically relevant, and in order to guarantee equitable organ allocation based on the MELD score, similar laboratory methodologies should be implemented at all centers in the same organ procurement area. Alternatively, the possibility of setting up a central laboratory in each organ procurement area should be considered. Liver Transpl 15: 300 -305, 2009.

Nutrition education resources are of interest for cancer patients and survivors throughout the cancer continuum. We examined the web-based nutrition information in Spanish for cancer patients and survivors provided by national cancer organizations (NCOs). The Guide to Internet Resources for Cancer and the membership list of the Union for International Cancer Control were searched to identify the NCOs. The International Patients Decisions Aid Standards (IPDAS) was used to describe the quality of the available information. We identified 20 NCOs that provided nutrition information aimed at a general audience on their websites. Web-based resources of nine NCOs were selected for presentation in this review. Website scores ranged between 20 and 24 in the IPDAS scale (maximum score = 31). The selected NCOs offered reliable and safe information. Healthy eating information for cancer patients and management of side-effects was provided by all websites. Information was more limited for cancer survivors. We recommend that NCOs increase the possibilities for personalized recommendations and interaction with the content by including instrumental tools on their websites.