Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, obstetric care has adopted new precautions to ensure services can be maintained for pregnant women. The aim of this study was to describe access to and quality of obstetric care for pregnant and postpartum women during the COVID-19 pandemic and to identify factors that predict quality of care at this time.Methods: Between May 3 and June 28, 2020, we recruited women who were pregnant or within the first 6 months after delivery to participate in an online survey. This included questions on access to obstetric healthcare (type and place of health care provider, changes to obstetric appointments/services, appointment preferences) and the Quality of Prenatal Care Questionnaire (QPCQ).Results: Of the 917 eligible women, 612 (67%) were pregnant and 305 (33%) were in the first 6 months after delivery. Sixty-two percent (n = 571) reported that COVID-19 had affected their healthcare; appointments were rearranged, canceled or occurred via virtual means for 29% (n = 166), 29% (n = 167), and 31% (n = 175) of women, respectively. The majority preferred to physically attend appointments (74%; n = 676) and perceived the accompaniment of birth partners as important (77%; n = 471). Sixty-two percent (n = 380) were permitted a birth partner at delivery, 18% (n = 111) were unsure of the rules while 4% (n = 26) were not permitted accompaniment. During pregnancy, QPCQ was negatively associated with disruption to obstetric services including exclusion or uncertainty regarding birth partner permissions [F(7, 433) = 11.5, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.16] while QPCQ was negatively associated with inadequate breastfeeding support postpartum [F(1, 147) = 12.05, p = 0.001, R2 = 0.08].Conclusion: Pregnant and postpartum have experienced disruption in their access to obstetric healthcare. Perceived quality of obstetric care was negatively influenced by cancellation of appointment(s), suspension of services and exclusion of birth partners at delivery. During this time, continuity of care can be fulfilled via virtual and/or phone appointments and women should receive clear guidance on changes to services including birth partner permissions to attend delivery.

The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of the record. Please see the repository URL above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.

Background Premenopausal women have a lower incidence of cardiovascular disease, which may partly be due to a protective effect of estrogen on endothelial function. Animal studies suggest that estrogen may also improve the relationship between shear rate ( SR ) and endothelial function. We aimed to explore the relationship between endothelial function (ie, flow‐mediated dilation [ FMD ]) and SR (ie, SR area under the curve [ SRAUC ]) in women versus men, and between pre‐ versus postmenopausal women. Methods and Results Brachial artery FMD and SRAUC were measured in accordance with expert‐consensus guidelines in 932 healthy participants who were stratified into young adults (18‐40 years, 389 men, 144 women) and older adults (>40 years, 260 men, 139 women). Second, we compared premenopausal (n=173) and postmenopausal women (n=110). There was evidence of a weak correlation between SRAUC and FMD in all groups but older men, although there was variation in strength of outcomes. Further exploration using interaction terms (age‐sex× SRAUC ) in linear regression revealed differential relationships with FMD (young women versus young men [β=−5.8 −4 , P =0.017] and older women [β=−5.9 −4 , P =0.049]). The correlation between SRAUC and FMD in premenopausal women ( r 2 =0.097) was not statistically different from that in postmenopausal women ( r 2 =0.025; Fisher P =0.30). Subgroup analysis using stringent inclusion criteria for health markers (n=505) confirmed a stronger FMD ‐ SRAUC correlation in young women compared with young men and older women. Conclusions Evidence for a stronger relationship between endothelial function and the eliciting SR stimulus is present in young women compared with men. Estrogen may contribute to this finding, but larger healthy cohorts are required for conclusive outcomes.

Increase in mean shear stress represents an important and potent hemodynamic stimulus to improve conduit artery endothelial function in humans. No previous study has examined whether fluctuations in shear rate patterns, without altering mean shear stress, impacts conduit artery endothelial function. This study examined the hypothesis that 30-min exposure to fluctuations in shear rate patterns, in the presence of unaltered mean shear rate, improves brachial artery flow-mediated dilation. Fifteen healthy men (27.3 ± 5.0 yr) completed the study. Bilateral brachial artery flow-mediated dilation was assessed before and after unilateral exposure to 30 min of intermittent negative pressure (10 s, −40mmHg; 7 s, 0 mmHg) to induce fluctuation in shear rate, while the contralateral arm was exposed to a resting period. Negative pressure significantly increased shear rate, followed by a decrease in shear rate upon pressure release (both P < 0.001). Across the 30-min intervention, mean shear rate was not different compared with baseline ( P = 0.458). A linear mixed model revealed a significant effect of time observed for flow-mediated dilation ( P = 0.029), with exploratory post hoc analysis showing an increase in the intervention arm (∆FMD +2.0%, P = 0.008), but not in the contralateral control arm (∆FMD +0.5%, P = 0.664). However, there was no effect for arm ( P = 0.619) or interaction effect ( P = 0.096). In conclusion, we found that fluctuations in shear patterns, with unaltered mean shear, improves brachial artery flow-mediated dilation. These novel data suggest that fluctuations in shear pattern, even in the absence of altered mean shear, represent a stimulus to acute change in endothelial function in healthy individuals. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Intermittent negative pressure applied to the forearm induced significant fluctuations in antegrade and retrograde shear rate, while mean shear was preserved relative to baseline. Our exploratory study revealed that brachial artery flow-mediated dilation was significantly improved following 30-min exposure to intermittent negative pressure. Fluctuations in blood flow or shear rate, with unaltered mean shear, may have important implications for vascular health; however, further research is required to identify the underlying mechanisms and potential long-term health benefits.