BackgroundLonger life expectancy is associated with an increasing prevalence of kidney disease. Aging itself may cause renal damage, but the spectrum of kidney disorders that affect elderly patients is diverse. Few studies, mostly form US, Asia and West Europe found differences in the prevalence of some types of kidney diseases between elderly and younger patients based on renal biopsy findings, with varied proportion between glomerulopathies and arterionephrosclerosis as a dominant injury found. Here, for the first time in Eastern Europe we analyzed native kidney biopsy findings and their relationship to clinical characteristics at the time of biopsy in elderly individuals (aged ≥65) in comparison to younger adults (aged 18–64).MethodsBiopsy and clinical data from 352 patients aged ≥65 were retrospectively identified, analyzed and compared with a control group of 2214 individuals aged 18–64. All kidney biopsies studied were examined at Medical University of Warsaw in years 2009–14.ResultsIn elderly patients the leading indication for biopsy was nephrotic range proteinuria without hematuria (34.2%) and the most prevalent pathologic diagnoses were: membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN) (18.2%), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) (17.3%) amyloidosis (13.9%) and pauci immune glomerulonephritis (12.8%). Hypertension and age-related lesions very rarely were found an exclusive or dominant finding in a kidney biopsy (1.7%) and a cause of proteinuria (1.1%) in elderly individuals. There were 18.2% diabetics among elderly individuals, and as much as 75% of them had no morphologic signs of diabetic kidney disease in the renal biopsy. Amyloidosis, MGN, pauci immune GN, crescentic GN and light and/or heavy chain deposition disease (LCDD/HCDD) were more frequent whereas IgA nephropathy (IgAN), lupus nephritis (LN) and thin basement membrane disease (TBMD) were less common among elderly than in younger patients.ConclusionsProteinuria, a dominating manifestation in elderly patients subjected to kidney biopsy was most commonly related to glomerulopathies. The relatively high prevalence of potentially curative kidney diseases in elderly individuals implicates the importance of renal biopsy in these patients.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12882-016-0410-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Following on from the recently published articles reported side effects occurring due to donation of stem cells, we describe a case of a donor with transient, biopsy-proved acute focal segmental proliferative glomerulonephritis (GN) due to peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). A 44-year-old woman with no relevant past medical history suffering from obesity and hypertension well controlled with metoprolol without hypertensive retinopathy was admitted to our hospital as a donor of PBSC. She received G-CSF subcutaneously-filgrastim (Amgen)-at a dose of 5 microg/kg twice a day for 6 days. The macroscopic hematuria and proteinuria occurred on 5th day of G-CSF administration. Due to mobilization and collection of stem cells, proteinuria was becoming more intense and reached the nephrotic range. The immunological, infectious, urological and gynecological causes of such complication were excluded. The final histological recognition was early stage of focal segmental proliferative GN. To our knowledge this a first report of GN in a donor due to mobilization of PBSC confirmed with renal biopsy. These findings suggest that filgrastim may induce transient urinary excretion of protein and hematuria in PBSC donors as the symptoms of acute GN without adversely affecting renal function.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.