No abstract

Background The standard first‐line treatment for primary mediastinal B‐cell lymphoma (PMBCL) patients is rituximab‐based immunochemotherapy; however, this is not due to the result of randomized clinical trials. Aims We retrospectively investigated 53 PMBCL patient outcomes treated either with R‐CHOP‐21 or DA‐EPOCH‐R‐28. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were complete remission (CR), overall response rate (ORR), progression‐free survival (PFS), and treatment‐related complications. Results Treatment with R‐CHOP‐21 resulted in a 92.0% ORR (60% CR), while DA‐EPOCH‐R yielded a 92.6% ORR (70.4% CR). There were no differences in the occurrence of grade 3‐4 hematological adverse events, but grade 1‐2 cardiologic complications (P = .003) were observed more frequently in the DA‐EPOCH‐R arm. Median PFS and OS were not achieved. The differences in estimated 12‐month PFS in R‐CHOP and DA‐EPOCH‐R group (87% vs 73.9%) and OS (100% vs 92%) were insignificant. Patients treated with R‐CHOP‐21 and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto‐HSCT) had an improved OS (P = .03) but not PFS (P = .43) compared to those treated solely with R‐CHOP‐21. No differences in PFS or OS were observed between patients treated with R‐CHOP‐21/auto‐HSCT and DA‐EPOCH‐R. Conclusion The results of this study suggest that R‐CHOP‐21 may be an alternative to DA‐EPOCH‐R treatment for PMBCL patients.

We retrospectively analyzed long-term disease outcome of 350 elderly Hodgkin Lymphoma (eHL) patients treated with ABVD/ABVD-like regimen enrolled in the PLRG-R9 study between 2001 and 2013 in Poland. Complete remission was reported for 73% of early (ES) and 61% advanced stage (AS) patients. Nine (10%) ES and 56 (20%) AS patients have died. With the median follow-up of 36 (1-190) months, 3-year EFS and OS was 0.74 (95%CI: 0.63-0.85) and 0.90 (95%CI: 0.82-0.98) for ES; 0.51 (95%CI: 0.44-0.57), and 0.81 (95%CI: 0.75-0.86) for AS patients, respectively. For ES patients, Cox regression revealed ECOG <2 and age >70 as predictive for inferior OS and EFS. For AS patients, the most predictive for OS was the presence of cardiovascular disorders (CVD) (p = .00044), while for EFS four factors were significantly associated with a poor outcome: ECOG< 2, age >70 years, CVD and extranodal disease. In conclusion, CVD significantly impacts outcomes of ABVD-treated advanced eHL patients.

Summary R‐CVP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone) and R‐CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone + rituximab) are immunochemotherapy regimens frequently used for remission induction of indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHLs). Rituximab maintenance (RM) significantly improves progression‐free survival (PFS) in patients with complete/partial remission (CR/PR). Here we report the final results of a randomized study comparing R‐CVP to R‐CHOP both followed by RM. Untreated patients in need of systemic therapy with symptomatic and progressive iNHLs including follicular (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue (MALT), small lymphocytic (SLL), and lymphoplasmacytic (LPL) lymphoma were eligible. Patients were randomized to receive R‐CVP or R‐CHOP for eight cycles or until complete response (CR). All patients with CR/PR (partial response) received RM 375 mg/m2 q 2 months for 12 cycles. Primary endpoint was event‐free survival (EFS). Two‐hundred and fifty patients [FL 42%, MZL/MALT 38%, LPL/ Waldenström Macroglobulinaemia (WM) 11%, SLL 9%] were enrolled and randomized (R‐CHOP: 127, R‐CVP: 123). Median age was 56 years (21–85), 44% were male, 90% were in stage III–IV, 43% of FL patients had a Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) score ≥3, and 33·4% of all patients had an IPI score ≥3. At the end of induction treatment, the CR/PR rate was 43·6/50·9% and 36·3/60·8% in the R‐CHOP and R‐CVP groups (P = 0·218) respectively. After a median follow‐up of 67, 66, and 70 months, five‐year EFS was 61% vs. 56% (not significant), progression‐free survival (PFS) was 71% vs. 69% (not significant) and overall survival (OS) was 84% vs. 89% in the R‐CHOP vs. the R‐CVP arm respectively. Grade III/IV adverse events (65 vs. 22) occurred in 40 (33·1%) and 18 (15·3%) patients, P = 0·001; neutropenia in 16 (11·6%) and 4 (3·4%) patients, P = 0·017; infection in 14 (10·7%) and 3 (2·5%) patients,; P = 0·011; and a second neoplasm in three versus seven patients., in the R‐CHOP and the R‐CVP groups respectively. This multicentre randomized study with >five‐year follow‐up shows similar outcome in patients with indolent lymphoma in need of systemic therapy treated with R‐CVP or R‐CHOP immunochemotherapy and rituximab maintenance in both arms. The minor toxicity of the R‐CVP regimen makes it a reasonable choice for induction treatment, leaving other active agents like doxorubicin or bendamustin for second‐line therapy.

Sunitinib, a multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is a first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in patients in ‘low’ and ‘intermediate’ Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Heng risk groups. Disruptions of hematopoiesis, such as anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia, are typically observed during sunitinib treatment. When it comes to RBC parameters, an increase in mean cell volume (MCV) tends to occur, meeting the criteria for macrocytosis in some patients (MCV > 100 fL). We examined changes in RBC parameters of 27 mRCC patients treated with sunitinib (initial dose of 50 mg/day, 6-week treatment: 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off) and correlated them with progression-free survival time (PFS). Patients who had macrocytosis after 3 treatment cycles had significantly longer PFS than those whose MCV stayed less than 100 fL (not reached vs. 11.2 months, p < 0.001). We also found a correlation between MCV values after the first and third treatment cycles and the risk of progression: HR of 0.9 (0.81–0.99) and 0.76 (0.65–0.90) per 1 fL increase in MCV, respectively. The mechanism of MCV elevation during sunitinib treatment has not yet been fully explained. One of the probable causes is sunitinib’s inhibitory influence on c-Kit kinase, as is the case with imatinib. For mRCC patients, this phenomenon could help predict PFS, but since our sample was small, further studies are essential.