Objectives Emergency departments (EDs) often serve vulnerable populations who may lack primary care and have suffered disproportionate COVID-19 pandemic effects. Comparing patients having and lacking a regular source of medical care and other ED patient characteristics, we assessed COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, reasons for not wanting the vaccine, perceived access to vaccine sites and willingness to get the vaccine as part of ED care. Methods Cross sectional survey conducted from 12/10/2020 to 3/7/21 at 15 safety net United States EDs . Primary outcomes were COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, reasons for vaccine hesitancy, and sites (including EDs) for potential COVID-19 vaccine receipt. Results Of 2575 patients approached, 2301 (89.4%) participated . Of the 18.4% of respondents who lacked a regular source of medical care, 65% used the ED as their usual source of healthcare. The overall rate of vaccine hesitancy was 39%; the range among the 15 sites was 28 to 58%. Respondents who lacked a regular source of medical care were more commonly vaccine hesitant than those who had a regular source of medical care (47 vs 38%, 9% difference, 95% CI 4 – 14%). Other characteristics associated with greater vaccine hesitancy were younger age, female gender, African American race, Latinx ethnicity, and not having received an influenza vaccine in the past five years. Of the 61% COVID-19 vaccine acceptors, 21% stated that they lacked a primary doctor or clinic to receive it; the vast majority (95%) of these respondents would accept the COVID-19 vaccine as part of their care in the ED. Conclusions ED patients who lack a regular source of medical care are particularly hesitant to COVID-19 vaccination. Most COVID-19 vaccine acceptors would accept it as part of their care in the ED. EDs may have pivotal roles in COVID-19 vaccine messaging and delivery to highly vulnerable populations.

After stroke, black individuals have a greater prevalence of activity limitations than white individuals, largely due to their greater physical capacity limitations. Further understanding of the causes of racial differences in capacity after stroke is needed to reduce activity limitations after stroke and decrease racial disparities.

No abstract

Lingering unconscious biases and daily cues continue to permeate and persist in academic medicine environments in the form of the exclusion of physicians who are women or racially/ethnically underrepresented in medicine. Academic medicine environments must change so that women and underrepresented in medicine racial/ethnic groups are seen, heard, and valued. A shared awareness among faculty, administrators, and trainees can inform the development of intentional strategies to alter individual behaviors, academic spaces, and institutional processes to cultivate a sense of belonging. Shifting the norms in medicine and the course of historical exclusion will require professional development in areas of inclusive teaching practices, skills to cultivate mentoring relationships with diverse trainees, and fostering discussions about the relevance of personal identity, as well as attention to the symbolism and imagery in institutional messages (e.g., portraits on the walls, website, marketing campaigns) and to the value of including community involvement in productivity metrics.

No abstract