Craniopharyngiomas usually involve the sella and suprasellar space. Their occurrence in the posterior fossa without extension to the suprasellar region is uncommon with only 16 cases reported in the literature. We report a case of a primary posterior fossa craniopharyngioma that was managed by complete excision with a good recovery. Our case was unique in that the craniopharyngioma occurred in the fourth ventricle and extended downward to the level of C1, a manifestation that was reported only twice in the past. The literature on the topic is reviewed.
At present, the literature lacks data on the outcome of neurosurgery training programs in the Middle East. In this study we aim to assess the attrition, completion of training and success rates in the Saudi Board of Neurosurgery (SBNS).
MethodsA cohort of 115 trainees who started SBNS training during 2001-2014 was reviewed. The outcome was the rate of attrition, completion of training, and success in the final examination of the SBNS.
ResultsAttrition rate was 29% (14% to neurosurgery training elsewhere and 15% to non-neurosurgery). Completion of training rate was 71%. Success in the final examination rate was 74% (60% on the first attempt). Attrition rate was significantly influenced by being sponsored by University Hospitals. Success rate was impacted positively by being sponsored by King Fahad Medical City and negatively by Ministry of Health Hospitals. Trainees who started during 2011-2014 had a significantly better success rate in the final examination.
ConclusionsSBNS attrition rate was high due to access to training opportunities abroad, particularly for universitysponsored trainees. Success rate in the final examination was considered comparable to some other neurosurgical qualifications. The first attempt pass rate was significantly impacted by being sponsored by certain hospitals. Factors contributing to attrition and failure should be identified and addressed during the selection process and during training.
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of country self-citation rate (SCR) among medical specialties in Saudi Arabia, and to assess the impact of self-citations on the country's total cites world ranking in different specialties.
MethodsSCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) was used to collect data related to all medical specialties in Saudi Arabia for the period 1996-2019. The country SCR for the specialties was correlated with several bibliometric parameters and examined statistically. The specialties that showed a drop in Saudi Arabia's total cites world ranking following the exclusion of self-citations were identified.
ResultsThe median country SCR for 46 specialties in Saudi Arabia was 9.5% (range: 4.6-23.1%). The two specialties with the highest country SCR were Public Health (23.1%) and Family Practice (22.9%). Country SCR was significantly higher in the non-clinical specialties compared to clinical specialties (15.3% vs. 9.6%). It did not correlate significantly with any of the examined productivity indices. The exclusion of self-citations resulted in a drop in Saudi Arabia's total cites world ranking in six (13%) specialties only. There was no significant difference between the country's total cites and net total cites world rankings in the specialties.
ConclusionsSelf-citation may be appropriate and signify an expansion of the authors' previous work. Country SCR in medical specialties in Saudi Arabia is relatively low and not affected by total documents and total cites. Non-clinical specialties tend to self-cite more. The exclusion of self-citations had minimal effect on Saudi Arabia's total cites world ranking, indicating that country SCR in the specialties is unlikely to impact its international scientific standing. Our findings do not support the argument for eliminating self-citation from citation-based metrics. We believe that more collaborative and global research practices should be encouraged.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.