Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major cause of hepatitis in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Routes other than blood transfusion play a role in the spread of HCV in HD patients. Molecular studies of HCV implicate nosocomial transmission of the virus in HD units. We conducted a clinicovirological study in our HD unit to investigate if the hands of dialysis personnel could represent a mode of transmission of HCV among HD patients. Methods: One liter of sterile water was used for each handwashing of dialysis personnel. The washing was collected in a sterile container and tested for HCV-RNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) within 3 h of collection. Eighty handwashings from nurses dialyzing HCV-positive patients (groupe A) and 100 handwashing from nurses dialyzing HCV-negative patients (group B) were tested for HCV-RNA. As a control, 60 handwashings were collected from the dialysis personnel before entering the dialysis unit (group C) and tested for HCV-RNA. Results: HCV-RNA was positive in 19 (23.75%) of samples of group A, in 8 (8%) of samples of group B (p < 0.003) and in 2 (3.3%) of samples of group C (p < 0.35). These two positive samples of group C were from nurses who had dialyzed HCV-negative patients. Conclusion: These results indicate the presence of HCV-RNA on the hands of some dialysis personnel in our HD unit, in spite fo adherence to the standard precautions. The hands of dialysis personnel are therefore a potential mode for facilitating transmission of HCV between HD patients.

During a period of 10 years 18 men were treated for severe ethylene glycol (EG) intoxication. All patients received supportive measures and ethanol infusion. Hemodialysis (HD) was applied in 11 patients (Group I) whereas 7 patients, who exhibited more advanced toxicity symptoms, received peritoneal dialysis (PD) simultaneously with HD (Group II). Patients in Group II showed more advanced acidosis on admission than in Group I (Base excess -27.1 mmol/l versus -16.8 mmol/l, p < 0.0075). The results of treatment in these two groups of patients were compared. All patients in Group I survived and one patient in Group II died. The patients in Group II were discharged with higher serum creatinine and follow up time to improve renal function was longer than in Group I (252 versus 149 mumol/l, p < 0.015 and 23 versus 7.9 weeks, p < 0.05 respectively). No correlations were found between serum EG and grade of acidosis on admission or serum EG and subsequent increase of serum creatinine but acidosis on admission was highly correlated to the rise of serum creatinine after the 72 hours of observation time (p < 0.0001). It is concluded, that combined HD and PD treatment was beneficial in the presented patients as it corrected acidosis earlier and could eliminate EG and its toxic metabolites faster, improving prognosis.