The present Euro-Filling study demonstrates that the new 2016 recommendations for assessing LVFP non-invasively are fairly reliable and clinically useful, as well as superior to the 2009 recommendations in estimating invasive LVEDP.

No abstract

In patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), the presence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) has been linked to a poor prognosis. We aimed to assess the main determinants of PH in patients with severe AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We prospectively enrolled 108 consecutive patients with isolated severe AS (indexed aortic valve area <0.6 cm/m) and LVEF >50%, in sinus rhythm. Left atrial (LA) function was assessed using longitudinal deformation parameters (by speckle tracking echocardiography). PH (defined as systolic pulmonary artery pressure >40 mmHg) was present in 20 patients. Patients with severe AS and PH were older (p = 0.05), had higher BNP values (p = 0.05) and a greater degree of LV diastolic dysfunction: higher E/e' and E/A ratios and lower EDT values (p < 0.03 for all) compared to patients without PH. There were no differences between groups regarding AS severity and LV systolic function parameters. Patients with PH had a more impaired LA function: lower septal and lateral late diastolic peak velocity a' (p < 0.001 and p = 0.04 respectively) and lower LA peak longitudinal strain and strain rate parameters (p ≤ 0.005 for all). In multivariable analysis, LA late diastolic longitudinal strain rate was the only independent correlate of PH in our patients (p = 0.04). Patients with isolated severe AS, preserved LVEF and PH had larger LA volumes, a more impaired LA function, and higher LV filling pressures compared to those without PH. LA booster pump function, reflected by late diastolic longitudinal strain rate, emerged as an independent correlate of PH in these patients.

Aortic stenosis has an increasing prevalence in the context of aging population. In these patients non-invasive imaging allows not only the grading of valve stenosis severity, but also the assessment of left ventricular function. These two goals play a key role in clinical decision-making. Although left ventricular ejection fraction is currently the only left ventricular function parameter that guides intervention, current imaging techniques are able to detect early changes in LV structure and function even in asymptomatic patients with significant aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction. Moreover, new imaging parameters emerged as predictors of disease progression in patients with aortic stenosis. Although proper standardization and confirmatory data from large prospective studies are needed, these novel parameters have the potential of becoming useful tools in guiding intervention in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis and stratify risk in symptomatic patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.This review focuses on the mechanisms of transition from compensatory left ventricular hypertrophy to left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure in aortic stenosis and the role of non-invasive imaging assessment of the left ventricular geometry and function in these patients.

This review focuses on the available data regarding the utility of advanced left ventricular (LV) imaging in aortic stenosis (AS) and its potential impact for optimising the timing of aortic valve replacement. Ejection fraction is currently the only LV parameter recommended to guide intervention in AS. The cut-off value of 50%, recommended for decision-making in asymptomatic patients with AS, is currently under debate. Several imaging parameters have emerged as predictors of disease progression and clinical outcomes in this setting. Global longitudinal LV strain by speckle tracking echocardiography is useful for risk stratification of asymptomatic patients with severe AS and preserved LV ejection fraction.