Introduction: Arab populations have many similarities and dissimilarities. They share culture, language and religion but they are also subject to economic, political and social differences. The purpose of this study is to understand the causes of the rising trend of diabetes prevalence in order to suggest efficient actions susceptible to reduce the burden of diabetes in the Arab world. Method: We use principal component analysis to illustrate similarities and differences between Arab countries according to four variables: 1) the prevalence of diabetes, 2) impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), 3) diabetes related deaths and 4) diabetes related expenditure per person. A linear regression is also used to study the correlation between human development index and diabetes prevalence. Results: Arab countries are mainly classified into three groups according to the diabetes comparative prevalence (high, medium and low) but other differences are seen in terms of diabetes-related mortality and diabetes related expenditure per person. We also investigate the correlation between the human development index (HDI) and diabetes comparative prevalence (R = 0.81). Conclusion: The alarming rising trend of diabetes prevalence in the Arab region constitutes a real challenge for heath decision makers. In order to alleviate the burden of diabetes, preventive strategies are needed, based essentially on sensitization for a more healthy diet with regular exercise but health authorities are also asked to provide populations with heathcare and early diagnosis to avoid the high burden caused by complications of diabetes.
OATAO is an open access repository that collects the work of Toulouse researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible. This is an author-deposited version published in : http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/ Eprints ID : 16130To link to this article :
Background::
The need for a multidisciplinary team approach to provide physical exercise, diet, behavioral
change and insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treatment has long been recognized. However, often
patients with T2DM do not have access to a multidisciplinary team.
Introduction::
In developing countries most patients with T2DM receive their diabetes care in the office of an internist or
family practice physician or in a primary level health center with a general practitioner. Knowing the perceived barriers,
attitude, facilitators, and benefits in healthcare professionals toward multidisciplinary team approach in T2DM treatment
can help to facilitate implementation of multidisciplinary care in T2DM.
Methods::
A systematic search strategy was performed in six databases (PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, EMBASE,
MEDLINE, and Cochrane) using different keyword combinations to identify studies describing healthcare professionals’
views of multidisciplinary team care in T2DM. Textual narrative synthesis was used to analyse data. The Critical
Appraisals Skills Programme (CASP) tool for qualitative studies was used to assess risk of bias and transferability.
Results::
The views of health professionals about multidisciplinary team care in T2DM were categorized into six major
factors namely: working collaboratively to foster supportive relationships; strong committed organizational and team
leadership; diversity in expertise, with team members tailored to local circumstances; shared goals and approaches to
ensure consistency of message; clear and open communication with the team and with patients; and the patient at the
center of decision-making.
Conclusions::
There is a huge gap in shared roles among health professionals in T2DM therapy. Hence, there is need for
allied health professionals such as physiotherapists, dieticians, and psychologists with expertise in diabetes to explore
primary healthcare. Barriers and facilitators for successful integration of multidisciplinary team, seamlessly cut across
three hierarchal levels namely, health management; health professionals; and diabetic patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.