Despite advances in understanding and management, paediatric osteoarticular infections continue to pose diagnostic difficulties for clinicians. Delays in diagnosis can lead to potentially devastating morbidity.No single investigation, including joint aspiration, is sufficiently reliable to diagnose conclusively paediatric bone and joint infection. Diagnosis should be based on a combination of clinical signs, imaging and laboratory investigations. Algorithms should supplement, and not replace, clinical decision making in all cases.The roles of aspiration, arthrotomy and arthroscopy in the treatment of septic arthritis are not clearly defined. There is a very limited role for surgery in the management of acute haematogenous osteomyelitis.The ideal duration and mode of administration of antibiotic therapy for osteoarticular paediatric infection is not yet fully defined but there is increasing evidence that shorter courses (three weeks) and early conversion (day four) to oral administration is safe and effective in appropriate cases. Clear and concise antibiotic guidelines should be available based on local population characteristics, pathogens and their sensitivities.Kingella kingae is increasingly identified through polymerase chain reaction and is now recognised as the commonest pathogen in children aged under four years. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Panton-Valentine leukocidin-producing strains of Staph. aureus are being increasingly reported.A multidisciplinary integrated evidence-based approach is required to optimise outcomes.Further large-scale, multicentre studies are needed to delineate the optimal management of paediatric osteoarticular infection. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2017;1:7-12. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160027.

Background: Limb lengthening using intramedullary externally controlled motorized devices is becoming increasingly popular. There is limited literature regarding their use in the pediatric and adolescent population. This study reviews outcomes on 50 consecutive cases of intramedullary lower limb lengthening surgery in this population. Methods: A retrospective review of all pediatric and adolescent patients treated in our institution by intramedullary lengthening for lower limb length discrepancy using the PRECICE and STRYDE intramedullary lengthening nails between 2013 and 2019. All patients were operated by a single surgeon. Data were prospectively recorded. We report on nail accuracy and reliability, consolidation index, time to full weight-bearing from completion of lengthening, joint range of movement, ASAMI bone and functional scores, presence of problems, obstacles and complications, and patient reported outcome measures (PROMS). Results: Fifty cases (43 femoral and 7 tibial nails) were performed in 42 patients (20 males, 48% and 22 females, 52%). Six patients had bilateral lengthening and 2 patients had sequential lengthening. There were 28 antegrade femoral, 13 retrograde femoral and 5 tibia PRECICE nails, 2 tibial and 2 femoral PRECICE STRYDE nails. Mean age at surgery was 15 years old (12 to 17). Mean preoperative length discrepancy was 49 mm (20 to 90). Mean achieved lengthening was 46.5 mm (20 to 80). Mean percentage lengthening was 12.6% (5% to 25%). Nail accuracy was 96% and reliability 90%. Average distraction rate was 0.92 mm/d for femur and 0.64 mm/d for tibias. Consolidation index was 28 d/cm (18 to 43) and 39 d/cm (20 to 47), respectively. Time from completion of lengthening to independent full weight-bearing as observed in clinic was 45 days (21 to 70) and 34.2 days (23 to 50), respectively. ASAMI bone and functional scores were favorable and PROMS demonstrated high patient satisfaction levels. No significant complications were observed. Conclusions: We have demonstrated excellent clinical results and high patient satisfaction with intramedullary lengthening in a pediatric/adolescent population. We highly recommend thorough preoperative preparation, patient education, and a multidisciplinary approach. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Aims The STRYDE nail is an evolution of the PRECICE Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System, with unique features regarding its composition. It is designed for load bearing throughout treatment in order to improve patient experience and outcomes and allow for simultaneous bilateral lower limb lengthening. The literature published to date is limited regarding outcomes and potential problems. We report on our early experience and raise awareness for the potential of adverse effects from this device. Methods This is a retrospective review of prospective data collected on all patients treated in our institution using this implant. We report the demographics, nail accuracy, reliability, consolidation index, and cases where concerning clinical and radiological findings were encountered. There were 14 STRYDE nails implanted in nine patients (three male and six female) between June 2019 and September 2020. Mean age at surgery was 33 years (14 to 65). Five patients underwent bilateral lengthening (two femoral and three tibial) and four patients unilateral femoral lengthening for multiple aetiologies. Results At the time of reporting, eight patients (13 implants) had completed lengthening. Osteolysis and periosteal reaction at the junction of the telescopic nail was evident in nine implants. Five patients experienced localized pain and swelling. Macroscopic appearances following retrieval were consistent with corrosion at the telescopic junction. Tissue histology was consistent with effects of focal metallic wear debris. Conclusion From our early experience with this implant we have found the process of lengthening to be accurate and reliable with good regenerate formation and consolidation. Proposed advantages of early load bearing and the ability for bilateral lengthening are promising. We have, however, encountered concerning clinical and radiological findings in several patients. We have elected to discontinue its use to allow further investigation into the retrieved implants and patient outcomes from users internationally. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6):1168–1172.

Management of patellofemoral joint pathology is challenging as a result of the unique and complex organization of static forces and dynamic factors contributing to its functional capacity. Anterior knee pain is a common musculoskeletal complaint seen daily in the practices of primary care physicians, rheumatologists, and orthopedic surgeons. The key to successful treatment lies not only in the correct diagnosis of a chondral defect, but more importantly, in the accurate identification of associated pathomechanical factors. Appreciating the pathoanatomic basis of the disease and addressing imbalances and anatomical abnormalities should guide treatment.Despite the complexity of the interplay of various components it is essential to attempt to describe patellar malalignement as a clinical entity in order to proceed with appropriate surgical management and successful outcomes. The goals of patellofemoral re- alignment surgery should be to create both a stable environment for optimal extensor mechanism performance and an appropriate load transmission for optimal cartilage wear and joint loading. In the context of this article we will review the operative management of patellofemoral malalignment; the indications for surgery, the different techniques available and the evidence regarding their effectiveness.A large number of procedures have been employed and they have all undergone various modifications over the course of the years. The majority of publications are retrospective series in poorly defined population groups. There are significant methodological inconsistencies and as a result there is lack of strong evidence base for the majority of these procedures.

No abstract