In order to qualify as a case of atopic dermatitis, we propose that an individual must have an itchy skin condition plus three or more of the following: history of flexural involvement, a history of asthma/hay fever, a history of a generalized dry skin, onset of rash under the age of 2 years, or visible flexural dermatitis. When tested in an independent sample of 200 consecutive dermatology outpatients of all ages, this arrangement of the diagnostic criteria achieved 69% sensitivity and 96% specificity when validated against physician's diagnosis. Based on the findings of this first exercise, minor modifications in the wording of the criteria were undertaken, and these were tested on a sample of 114 consecutive children attending out-patient paediatric dermatology clinics. Overall discrimination improved, with a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 96%. The simplified criteria are easy to use, take under 2 min per patient to ascertain, and do not require subjects to undress. These two independent validation studies suggest that the newly proposed criteria for atopic dermatitis perform reasonably well in hospital out-patient patients. Further validation in community settings and in developing countries is needed.

A working party of 13 dermatologists, two family practitioners and a paediatrician was assembled, with the aim of developing a minimum list of reliable discriminators for atopic dermatitis. Each physician was asked to select 10 consecutive new cases of unequivocal mild to moderate atopic dermatitis and 10 controls with other inflammatory dermatoses. Each subject was examined by two independent observers, who were blind to the clinical diagnosis and study aim, with regard to 31 clinically useful diagnostic features for atopic dermatitis. Two hundred and twenty-four patients were studied (120 cases and 102 controls). Using the key physician's clinical diagnosis as a gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of each of the 31 diagnostic criteria were tested. Using multiple logistic regression techniques, a minimum set of diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis was derived. These were: history of flexural involvement, history of a dry skin, onset under the age of 2, personal history of asthma, history of a pruritic skin condition, and visible flexural dermatitis. Adjustment for age, sex, region, social class and ethnic group did not alter the choice of final criteria. The discriminatory value of these criteria was also satisfactory when tested against a further sample of 150 patients drawn from the community, who did not have skin disease.

One reason why so little is known about the epidemiology of atopic dermatitis (AD) is lack of suitable diagnostic criteria. A simple list of diagnostic criteria for AD for use in epidemiological studies has recently been developed by a U.K. working party. These have performed well in hospital validation studies of subjects with skin diseases. This study sought to validate the newly proposed criteria for AD in a population setting by conducting a cross-sectional survey of 695 schoolchildren aged 3-11 years in three randomly selected primary schools in West Lambeth, London. As a point prevalence measure, the U.K. criteria had a sensitivity of 70%, a specificity of 93%, and a positive predictive value of 47% when compared with a dermatologist's examination findings. Subsequent analysis suggested that most children classified as false positives had suffered from AD in the last year, but were inactive at the time of examination. When adjusted for these cases, the sensitivity and specificity increased to 80 and 97%, respectively, corresponding to positive and negative predictive values of 80 and 97%, respectively. The U.K. diagnostic criteria for AD appear to work well as a 1-year period prevalence measure in London schoolchildren. Further validation in adults and other countries are needed.

No abstract

One reason why so little is known about the epidemiology of atopic dermatitis (AD) is lack of suitable diagnostic criteria. A simple list of diagnostic criteria for AD for use in epidemiological studies has recently been developed by a U.K. working party. These have performed well in hospital validation studies of subjects with skin diseases. This study sought to validate the newly proposed criteria for AD in a population setting by conducting a cross-sectional survey of 695 schoolchildren aged 3-11 years in three randomly selected primary schools in West Lambeth, London. As a point prevalence measure, the U.K. criteria had a sensitivity of 70%, a specificity of 93%, and a positive predictive value of 47% when compared with a dermatologist's examination findings. Subsequent analysis suggested that most children classified as false positives had suffered from AD in the last year, but were inactive at the time of examination. When adjusted for these cases, the sensitivity and specificity increased to 80 and 97%, respectively, corresponding to positive and negative predictive values of 80 and 97%, respectively. The U.K. diagnostic criteria for AD appear to work well as a 1-year period prevalence measure in London schoolchildren. Further validation in adults and other countries are needed.