BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis of the knee joint leads to a decrease in the volume of movements, a violation of the sliding of articular surfaces, and a change in the axis of the limb under load, which affects the biomechanics of walking. AIM: This study aims to compare the results of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and manual techniques, their influence on the biomechanical and podometric parameters of the patient’s walk. METHODS: A prospective randomized study of 68 patients was carried out in the period from 2020 to 2021. Our follow-up period was 1 year. All patients were performed arthroplasty of one knee joint. The main Group “A” included 33 patients TKA with the use of an active robotic setting “TSolution-One” (“THINK Surgical, Inc.” [Fremont, California, USA]); the comparison Group “B” consisted of 35 patients with manual technic of TKA. We studied pain syndrome on the visual analog scale, functional state on the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), the volume of ROM movements, and the deviation of the mechanical axis by teleroentgenography of the lower limb. Objective analysis of limb function was performed on the «Alter-G» and the «C-mill». RESULTS: Post-operative pain syndrome on the 1st day after surgery in Group A is stronger by 7.9%, but by the 5th day after surgery in Group A, the pain syndrome is lower by 14.3%. ROM in Group A is better by 16% by 3 months after surgery, after 1 year by 10%. The positioning accuracy of the implant in Group A is 30% better. There are no statistically significant differences in the OKS and WOMAC scales between the groups. The results of restoring normal step in Group A are 13.5% better than in Group B. CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted TKA gives more accurate alignment of the mechanical axis, which improves the biomechanics of walking.

Background and objective: There is a general clinical concern on the negative impact of obesity on surgical complications and functional outcomes. We hypothesized that the patients with morbid obesity are exceptionally prone to a significantly increased risk for surgical and short-term complications after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). We aimed to identify the range of Body Mass Index (BMI) values of patients with a significant risk for lower functional improvement after THA. Materials and methods: In Stage 1 of the study, we conducted a retrospective comparative analysis of the rate of complications and functional outcomes in patients treated by primary THA, with normal weight (BMI 19–25, N = 1205) vs. Class 1 (BMI 26–34, N = 450), Class 2 (BMI 35–39, N = 183), and Class 3 (BMI ≥ 40, N = 47) obese patients. After the statistical similarity rates of complications and 6- and 12-month functional outcomes (by Harris Hip and SF-36 scores) were revealed in Class 1 patients and patients with normal BMI, we conducted the Stage 2 prospective study, by the same comparison protocol, on the cohorts of Class 2 (N = 29) and Class 3 (N = 16) patients compared to the Class 1 patients (N = 37) as controls. Results: Stage 1: There was no difference in surgical complications and function on 6- and 12-month postoperative follow-up (physical and mental) between Class 1 and patients with normal BMI (p > 0.05). Surgical complications were significantly higher in Class 2 (p < 0.05) and Class 3 (p < 0.001) patients. Functional activity on the 12-month follow-up increased significantly in all study groups, but in the Class 3 patients, the functional parameters were significantly lower (0.001). The mental health status on the follow-up was similar in all study groups. Stage 2 study revealed similar to the retrospective study comparison of parameters, except for the significantly lower mental health scores in Class 2 and Class 3 patients (p < 0.05) and functional scores in Class 3 patients (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Although the functional ability increased in all patients, it was significantly lower in Class 3 patients (with morbid obesity). Therefore, the patients with Class 1 and Class 2 obesity should be conceptionally distinguished from Class 3 patients in the decision-making process for a primary THA because of the less favorable functional and mental health improvement in those with morbid obesity (Class 3).

Background: The routine use of postoperative wound drainage following total hip arthroplasty (THA) to avoid the creation of excessive haematomas is controversial because of the potential risk of blood loss and wound infection. Methods: In a prospective double-blind controlled study, 2 groups of patients with hip joint osteoarthritis were operated with primary THA, 1 with surgical wound negative pressure drainage (Group 1 – 635 patients) and the other without (Group 2 – 527 patients). Postoperative blood haemoglobin and haematocrit levels, the necessity for blood transfusion, values of the potential infection markers (serum C-reactive protein values and erythrocyte sedimentation rate), postoperative pain level (according to the VAS scale) and functional outcome (according to Harris Hip Score [HHS] and SF-36 scores) at 12 months postoperatively were compared. Results: A significantly higher drop in blood haemoglobin and haematocrit values was observed in the Group 1 patients (mean drop of 2.2 gr/dl ± 0.25 vs. 1.6 gr/dl ± 0.35 and mean drop of 16% ± 4.0 vs. 11% ± 3.0, respectively, p  < 0.01, paired t test). The need for blood transfusion was significantly higher in the Group 1 patients (4.9% vs. 3.9%, p  < 0.05, t test). The severity of pain (VAS scale) on the first day after the operation was significantly lower in the Group 1 patients ( p < 0.05, t test), but overall, in both groups it was of low intensity (VAS <3). A similar postoperative wound infection rate was observed in both groups (0.4%). HHS and SF-36 scores were similar in both groups. Conclusions: The drainage of surgical wounds following primary THA due to hip osteoarthritis has a low added value and might cause an increased requirement for blood transfusion.

Background and Objective: Postoperative (post-op) pain control has an important impact on post-op rehabilitation. The logistics of its maintenance challenge the effect of peripheral nerve block on post-op pain control, with the risk for post-op complications. We hypothesized that perioperative use of local infiltration analgesia (LIA) is comparable to post-op pain control by peripheral nerve block. Materials and Methods: We evaluated three groups of patients treated with primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to symptomatic end-stage osteoarthritis with post-op pain control by LIA (LIA group, n=52), femoral plus sciatic nerve block (FSNB) (FSNB group, n=54), and without local or regional analgesia as controls (Control group, n=53). The primary outcome variable was the post-op pain level intensity as measured by the visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcome variables were knee function measured by the Knee Society Score (KSS) and the quadriceps muscle strength recovery profile. Results: Up to 4 hours post-op, pain intensity was significantly lower in FSNB patients (P<0.05). This effect of the peripheral nerve block on the pain level disappeared 6 hours post-op. The LIA and FSNB patients showed a significant decrease in pain intensity on days 2 and 3 post-op (P<0.05) with no mutual differences (P>0.05). This effect disappeared on day 4 post-op (P>0.05). The KSS score showed similar significant improvement of functional abilities (P<0.001) in all three groups. There was no difference in KSS scores among the groups 6 months after surgery (P>0.05). Quadriceps muscle recovery profile was similar in the LIA and Control groups, but significantly poorer in the FSNB group (P<0.001). Conclusion: The value of very short-term and improved pain relief of post-op FSNB over LIA of the surgical wound should be carefully weighed against its cost, logistics, and potential complication threat.

No abstract