Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms

Abstract

Following a request from EFSA, the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR) developed an opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) models and their use in prospective environmental risk assessment (ERA) for pesticides and aquatic organisms. TKTD models are species-and compound-specific and can be used to predict (sub)lethal effects of pesticides under untested (time-variable) exposure conditions. Three different types of TKTD models are described, viz., (i) the 'General Unified Threshold models of Survival' (GUTS), (ii) those based on the Dynamic Energy Budget theory (DEBtox models), and (iii) models for primary producers. All these TKTD models follow the principle that the processes influencing internal exposure of an organism, (TK), are separated from the processes that lead to damage and effects/mortality (TD). GUTS models can be used to predict survival rate under untested exposure conditions. DEBtox models explore the effects on growth and reproduction of toxicants over time, even over the entire life cycle. TKTD model for primary producers and pesticides have been developed for algae, Lemna and Myriophyllum. For all TKTD model calibration, both toxicity data on standard test species and/or additional species can be used. For validation, substance and species-specific data sets from independent refined-exposure experiments are required. Based on the current state of the art (e.g. lack of documented and evaluated examples), the DEBtox modelling approach is currently limited to research applications. However, its great potential for future use in prospective ERA for pesticides is recognised. The GUTS model and the Lemna model are considered ready to be used in risk assessment. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.The EFSA Journal is a publication of the European Food Safety Authority, an agency of the European Union. As a third deliverable of this mandate, the PPR Panel is asked to develop a Scientific Opinion describing the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) models for aquatic organisms and prospective environmental risk assessment (ERA) for pesticides with the main focus on: (i) regulatory questions that can be addressed by TKTD modelling, (ii) available TKTD models for aquatic organisms, (iii) model parameters that need to be included and checked in evaluating the acceptability of regulatory relevant TKTD models, and (iv) selection of the species to be modelled.Chapter 2 presents the underlying concepts, terminology, application domains and complexity levels of three different classes of TKTD models intended to be used in risk assessment, viz., (i) the 'General Unified Threshold models of Survival' (GUTS), (ii) toxicity models derived from the Dynamic Energy Budget theory (DEBtox models), and (iii) models for primary producers. All ...

Predicting Mixture Effects over Time with Toxicokinetic–Toxicodynamic Models (GUTS): Assumptions, Experimental Testing, and Predictive Power

“… 10 , 14 , 17 Risk assessment needs such a generic approach, applicable in an efficient way to different organisms and thousands of chemicals in the environment. 1 The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) recently recognized the GUTS framework as ready to use in ERA, 23 and we here formalized for the first time the GUTS framework for mixture toxicity assessment.…”

“…Hence, they are efficient models for effect assessment because they require a few data, no measurement of body residues, and no other toxicokinetic information. 23 To extend GUTS, we first translate the classical mixture effect assumptions into equivalent mechanistic concepts to be implemented into the equations of the GUTS-RED models. We then test the extended model assumptions and assess their predictive power by using bespoke mixture effect data and mixture experimental results from the literature.…”

New perspectives on the calculation of bioaccumulation metrics for active substances in living organisms

“…This tool could thus be used by risk assessors and decision makers in their daily work of assessing dossiers, e . g ., for the authorization of substances on the market (Ockleford et al, 2018), since all results provided by MOSAIC bioacc account for uncertainty and correlations between parameters. It could also be used by any environmental scientists, ecotoxicologists and managers when OECD n°305 tests are performed and need to be analysed.…”

“…Thanks to rjags, model parameters are retrieved as a joint posterior distribution from the likelihood of the observed data combined with prior distributions on parameters. All details on this approach can be found in the original research paper (Ratier et al, 2019) but also in many other papers in the field of ecotoxicology (Billoir et al, 2011; Ockleford et al, 2018).…”

“…The aims of these methods and tools are to quantify the exposure routes of potentially hazardous substances to assess dose-response relationships and to define critical effect concentrations, helping in understanding the underlying biological and ecological mechanisms, and developing indicators for environmental quality. In this context, toxicokinetic/toxicodynamic (TKTD) models are now strongly recommended to describe the exposure time-dependency on individual life-history traits from experimental data collected through standard toxicity tests (Ockleford et al, 2018). In particular, the TK part is used to relate the exposure medium concentration to the internal concentration within organisms, considering various processes such as accumulation, depuration, metabolization and excretion (ADME).…”