2015
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00117.2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limb suction evoked during arterial occlusion causes systemic sympathetic activity in humans

Abstract: -Venous saline infusions in an arterially occluded forearm evokes reflex increases in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and blood pressure (BP). We hypothesized that the application of suction to the human limbs would activate this venous distension reflex and raise sympathetic outflow. We placed airtight pressure tanks and applied 100 mmHg negative pressure to an arterially occluded limb (occlusion and suction, O&S) to induce tissue deformation without fluid translocation. BP, heart rate (HR), and MSNA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, infusion of albumin to raise venous osmotic pressure causes a greater and more sustained response, indicating that intravascular venous distension, and not an increase in interstitial fluid volume, is the stimulus for the response (6). Additionally, the venous distension response is related to the responses of arm and leg suction during circulatory occlusion (2). This suggests that similar venous distension mechanisms exist in the upper and lower extremities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, infusion of albumin to raise venous osmotic pressure causes a greater and more sustained response, indicating that intravascular venous distension, and not an increase in interstitial fluid volume, is the stimulus for the response (6). Additionally, the venous distension response is related to the responses of arm and leg suction during circulatory occlusion (2). This suggests that similar venous distension mechanisms exist in the upper and lower extremities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…While the data in humans are limited to only a few studies (2)(3)(4)(5)(6), there is evidence that peripheral venous distension elicits sympathoexcitation and increases blood pressure. For example, Cui et al (5) found that saline infusion into an antecubital vein of an occluded limb resulted in a nearly twofold increase in muscle sympathetic burst frequency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collectively, these findings suggest that the venous distension reflex in the legs may be involved in orthostatic intolerance in women. Because of the smaller volume of the forearm, it was easier to study the venous distension reflex in the forearm, but given the evidence of correlated responses between arms and legs (7), it is likely that the same outcomes would be found had we performed venous distension in the legs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies by Sinoway and colleagues (10,32) showed that distension of veins in the limbs can induce reflex vasoconstriction and systemic pressor responses. If this response occurred during application of negative pressure in the present study, it could offset the decrease in systemic pressor responses during exercise elicited by increases in LBF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, those studies also suggest that substantial venous congestion, distension of the veins, and/or tissue deformation within the leg is needed to induce systemic pressor responses. For example, Cui et al (10) showed that application of Ϫ100 mmHg to an arterially occluded leg increases muscle sympathetic nerve activity and induces a ϳ9 mmHg rise in MAP. In addition, Lott et al (32) demonstrated that application of Ϫ25 mmHg or Ϫ50 mmHg to one leg without occlusion has no influence on MAP, while application of Ϫ75 mmHg or Ϫ100 mmHg to the leg without occlusion evokes small increases in MAP (ϳ2 mmHg with application of Ϫ75 mmHg and ϳ3 mmHg with application of Ϫ100 mmHg).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%