2016
DOI: 10.1038/nature19764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro and ex vivo strategies for intracellular delivery

Abstract: Although carrier-mediated delivery systems offer promise for nucleic acid transfection in vivo 1,2 , membrane-disruption-based modalities are attractive candidates for universal delivery systems in vitro and ex vivo. In this review, we begin with motivations driving next-generation intracellular delivery strategies and suggest relevant requirements for future systems. Next, a broad overview of current delivery concepts covering salient strengths, challenges and opportunities is presented. Following that, our f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
742
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 710 publications
(767 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
1
742
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, access to the whole cytoplasm by the delivered protein remains elusive. A major hurdle in cytoplasmic protein delivery is the endosomal entrapment of the delivered cargo: nanocarrier-based delivery methods result in only a fraction of the entrapped cargo (often ~1%) escaping into the cytosol (Stewart et al ., 2016). Additionally, protease-mediated degradation and exocytosis of the remaining entrapped cargo proteins make these strategies ultimately inefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, access to the whole cytoplasm by the delivered protein remains elusive. A major hurdle in cytoplasmic protein delivery is the endosomal entrapment of the delivered cargo: nanocarrier-based delivery methods result in only a fraction of the entrapped cargo (often ~1%) escaping into the cytosol (Stewart et al ., 2016). Additionally, protease-mediated degradation and exocytosis of the remaining entrapped cargo proteins make these strategies ultimately inefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One important factor of the abovementioned unpredictability lies on the arduous control of the retention of nanoparticles inside a specific organelle, or the difficulty to generate a controlled diffusion of the nanostructures across the entire cell. At first glance it may seem that the heat generated can be retained in a single cell compartment at lower intensities or, if the irradiation is increased, it can literally "melt" the biological membranes [2], starting the diffusion of the nanoparticles throughout the cell [15] (Fig. 1).…”
Section: You Cannot Hit What You Cannot See: Understanding Pttmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined with nanoparticles, it represents a relatively novel and attractive tool that has grabbed the attention of both researchers and clinicians [1,2]. It consists of the use of nanoparticles with the ultimate goal to specifically localize in the diseased area, which upon illumination with a laser are able to convert the incoming light into heat which ultimately induce cell death of the affected area [3], similar to a nanometric scalpel.…”
Section: Introduction : H Y P E R T H E R M I a Nowadaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 In addition, their integration into liposomes to generate proteoliposomes holds great promise to vectorize therapeutic proteins. [10][11][12] Although various strategies are currently available for the delivery of intracellular proteins, 13 there is a lack of vectors for membrane proteins. Liposomes are safe nano-carriers that are ideal for the vectorization of not only chemical drugs but also a large number of biological molecules, including nucleic acids, peptides and proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%