2013
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00175.2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redundancy gains in retinotopic cortex

Abstract: It is widely claimed that interactions among simultaneously presented visual stimuli are suppressive and that these interactions primarily occur when stimuli fall within the same receptive field (Desimone and Duncan 1995). Here, we show evidence for a novel form of interaction between simultaneously presented but distant stimuli that does not fit either pattern. To examine interactions between simultaneously presented stimuli, we measure the response to a single stimulus as a function of whether or not other s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(54 reference statements)
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Shim and colleagues (2013) examined mechanisms of redundancy gain in complex objects (such as human faces, houses, scenes) by measuring BOLD responses to a single stimulus as a function of whether or not other stimuli are also presented simultaneously. The authors argued that the redundancy gain observed at early retinotopic cortex resulted from feedback from higher visual areas and might underlie perceptual averaging and other ensemble coding phenomena observed behaviorally (Shim, Jiang, & Kanwisher, 2013). Similar findings were reported in other studies on redundancy gains (Jiang, Kwon, Shim, & Won, 2010;Sweeny, Haroz, & Whitney, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Recently, Shim and colleagues (2013) examined mechanisms of redundancy gain in complex objects (such as human faces, houses, scenes) by measuring BOLD responses to a single stimulus as a function of whether or not other stimuli are also presented simultaneously. The authors argued that the redundancy gain observed at early retinotopic cortex resulted from feedback from higher visual areas and might underlie perceptual averaging and other ensemble coding phenomena observed behaviorally (Shim, Jiang, & Kanwisher, 2013). Similar findings were reported in other studies on redundancy gains (Jiang, Kwon, Shim, & Won, 2010;Sweeny, Haroz, & Whitney, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Multiple, simultaneously presented stimuli are known to compete for neuronal representation (Desimone & Duncan, 1995). Such competition could conceivably be greater for dissimilar than similar faces during perceptual encoding (Shim, Jiang, & Kanwisher, 2013). If the similarity advantage shown in Experiment 1 was due solely to reduced neural competition for similar faces during perceptual encoding, then it should be largely eliminated in Experiment 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This finding is congruent with the hypothesis of a bilateral early sensory representation for midline targets. Such bilateral representations have been shown to give rise to the so‐called “stimulus redundancy gain” effect (Miller & Van Nes, ; Shim, Jiang, & Kanwisher, ), namely the faster detection speed for identical stimuli displayed in both visual hemifields relative to when a single stimulus is displayed in either visual hemifield. In spite of its intuitive appeal of this hypothesis, it should be noted that there was no direct correspondence between this particular behavioral effect and the ERP findings reported in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%