2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.simyco.2014.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generic concepts in Nectriaceae

Abstract: The ascomycete family Nectriaceae (Hypocreales) includes numerous important plant and human pathogens, as well as several species used extensively in industrial and commercial applications as biodegraders and biocontrol agents. Members of the family are unified by phenotypic characters such as uniloculate ascomata that are yellow, orange-red to purple, and with phialidic asexual morphs. The generic concepts in Nectriaceae are poorly defined, since DNA sequence data have not been available for many of these gen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

15
345
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 353 publications
(365 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
15
345
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Aquanectria L. Lombard & Crous Lombard et al (2015) introduced this genus with a hyphomycetous asexual morph.…”
Section: Allantophomopsiellamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aquanectria L. Lombard & Crous Lombard et al (2015) introduced this genus with a hyphomycetous asexual morph.…”
Section: Allantophomopsiellamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clypeophysalosporaceae Giraldo & Crous Giraldo et al (2017) introduced Clypeophysalosporaceae and accepted three genera as members of it Coccinonectria L. Lombard & Crous Lombard et al (2015) introduced this genus with a hyphomycetous asexual morph. Coccinonectria resides in Nectriaceae in phylogenetic analyses (Lombard et al 2015).…”
Section: Catenulomyces Egidi and De Hoogmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was considered as Nectria ipomoeae associated with a sexual state (Nirenberg and Brielmaier-Liebetanz 1996). Nectria ipomoeae has been synonymised as Neocomospora ipomoeae by Lombard et al (2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A consensus was reached that Fusarium was to be the preferred name [16], while a minority of researchers advocated a subdivision of Fusarium into smaller genera [17]. Diseases are commonly named after the etiologic agent, in this case Fusarium spp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major problem now lies in the question how large the genus Fusarium actually is and which species are to be regarded as fusarium-like. Clinically relevant are especially the suggested renaming of the Fusarium dimerum species complex as Bisifusarium, and the resurrection of the genus Neocosmospora for the Fusarium solani species complex [17], while the other complexes are currently not in danger of renaming. Clinically, however, all these species give the same type of opportunistic infections ranging from onychomycosis, keratitis, to disseminated infections with necrotic lesions so there it is easiest to describe them all as Fusarium and fusarioses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%